Why the label is misleading
Malware detection usually combines signatures, reputation, runtime behavior and threat intelligence. A package analyzer can inspect the files, but it cannot see what happens after the extension loads, what a server returns or how the code behaves for a specific user.
That does not make static analysis useless. It is fast, private and good at finding capabilities and code patterns that deserve a closer look.
Related pages:browser extension privacy checkerare Chrome extensions safe
What static analysis can flag
Useful indicators include remote script references, eval-like calls, heavily obfuscated code, credential and cookie access, clipboard monitoring, crypto-mining patterns, raw IP endpoints and known temporary upload hosts.
Each indicator should be tied to a file, line and matched evidence. Without evidence, a scanner is asking you to trust a black box.
- Remote code and dynamic execution
- Obfuscation and unreadable bundles
- Credential, cookie and clipboard access
- Crypto-mining and exfiltration patterns
- Suspicious endpoints and temporary upload hosts
Related pages:remote script reference detectorextension JavaScript behavior analyzer
How to use the result safely
Do not install an extension only because a static scan is clean. Do not remove a legitimate extension only because a bundled library triggered a rule. Read the evidence, check the publisher and compare versions when an update changes the risk profile.
For high-value accounts, use a separate browser profile with a minimal extension set and review permissions after every major update.
Related pages:compare Chrome extension versionshow to audit an extension before install